Wednesday, December 30, 2015

Philippine Senatorial Election 2016: "Ang Aking Paninindigan" ~Rafael Alunan III

Poster courtesy of  Fred Amores of the  
Defenders of Philippine Sabah & Spratly Claims community

Rafael M. Alunan III, who has actually retired from government service to return to private sector, has come back from retirement to do national service and will run for senator in the Philippine senatorial election which will be held in May 2016.  During the last few years, the country has experienced real danger to its existence as the Republic, the Filipino people, the nation's institutions and the country's territorial integrity have been under assault internally and externally. Without a shadow of doubt, Alunan, a most fearless critic of the corrupt and the inept in government, a tireless advocate for good governance across the board, has now emerged as the strongest champion of national cohesion for the Philippine Republic. The country needs Alunan! FORMA - Friends of Rafael Alunan III organisation has endorsed Rafael Alunan III for senator 2016. ~~ Blog Administrator


 
Philippine Senatorial Election 2016: "Ang aking paninindigan" ~~ Rafael Alunan III

 

By Rafael M. Alunan III
23 December 2015

 

Ang aking mga pinaninindigan. Ulitin ko para maintidihan.

1. One Country. One Constitution. One Flag. Kung ipapasa ang BBL version na tinutulak ng isang paksyon ng MILF na kaugnay ng pamalaang Noynoy Aquino, magkakagulo lamang dahil sa daming mali sa pag-iisip, pag-sasalita at pag-gagawa.

2. Tsina. Ang imperialist policy ng Tsina ay ang kinakalaban natin. Gustong sakupin ng Tsina ang buong South China Sea, kasama na dyan ang ating Exclusive Economic Zone na saan tayo nangingisda at may laman na oil at gas reserves, na walang pinagbabasehan sa international law or historical basis. Kailangan nating patibayin ang ating national defense - internal at external -(economic, cyber, information, legal, diplomatc, law enforcement, intelligence, armed forces) para magkaroon tayo unti unti ng credible deterrence.

3. Poverty. Kailangan natin mabawasan ang kahirapan sa pamamagitan ng agri-aqua development, eco- at agro-tourism, manufacturing at serbisyo para sa kalahatang Pilipino at sa mundo. Kailangan ma-reunite natin ang mga pamilya na separado dahil sa diaspora. Reuniting them is key to national unity, transformation and development.

4. Good government. Ang pamahalaan ay dapat maging matino at mahusay. Honest and competent. Ito ang hinihintay ng lipunan, isang pamahalaan that does the right things and does things the right way, out of habit. Ngunit may isang kolatilya na dapat natin ma-intidihan. A society gets a government it deserves, kaya't ang sambayanan ay dapat maging matino at mahusay din para makamtan ang kanilang pangarap.

Tama po ba? Kaya ba natin ito?

NB: Paano mag-padala ng "abuloy": Mga kaibigan, maraming nagtatanong kung saan nila ipapadala ang kanilang abuloy (jejeje) para sa aking kandidatura sa Senado.

1.) For the account of Rafael M. Alunan III, Banco de Oro Quezon Avenue - West Triangle Branch.


  • PHPeso account: 000 270 141 766
  • USDollar account: 100 270 142 150
  • EURO account: 300 270 120 203

2.) Paypal instructions

Go to Paypal website. Click "Send" on top of the screen. Click on raffyalunan2016@gmail.com then enter the amount and currency.

Para malinaw sa lahat, ito'y para lang sa mga Pilipino na ibig tumulong sa akin, nasaan man sila sa ating bayan o sa mundo. Kung anong matatanggap dito, yan din ang basehan ng aking report sa Comelec.

Maraming salamat po.



~~~~O~~~~

 

RELATED ARTICLE: WHO AM I? I am Rafael “Raffy” Alunan III. I am a Filipino. 


Who am I?
By Rafael Alunan III
02 September 2015

I wrote this for those who don’t know, or don’t know enough of me, because I’ve been asked to consider returning to public life.

I am a Filipino. Also a Negrense, Ilonggo and Kapampangan; partly Spanish, French and Chinese; and, anecdotally, part Yemeni via Borneo. In other words, a genuine “askal.”

Here’s my fact sheet:

    · grew up in Bacolod and spent my vacations in Baguio. From my college years till now, I’ve lived mostly in Quezon City.

    · worked mainly for large corporations in an executive capacity; in non-profit organizations; and for myself as an entrepreneur.

    · served in the cabinets of two presidents, Cory Aquino and Fidel Ramos, to head the Department of Tourism and the Department of Interior and Local Government, respectively.

    · experienced life-threatening emergencies on land, in the air and at sea, and survived powerful natural phenomena that shaped my mindset for risk reduction and crisis management.

    · worked for peace that brought me to comprehend our history of exclusion, deprivation, entitlement, impunity, injustice and conflict.

    · been to rebel territory to bring the message of peace and, at times, to danger zones.

    · tackled crime and corruption with legal offensives; and came to grips with foreign terrorists to help save lives.

    · seen poverty up close – Metro Manila’s slums; the rural, coastal and upland poor of ARMM, Samar, Negros and the Cordilleras.

    · tackled poverty through peace and order campaigns in consonance with the principle that peace precedes sustained development.

    · fought the dictatorship to seek justice for its victims of repression; reclaim the future; restore freedom; and, later, defended it when it was threatened.

    In time I got to understand geopolitical issues; the importance of interdependence; and what it takes to build a nation.

In 67 years of existence, I’ve been tried by fire and tested by time. My mission is to serve, to matter and, hopefully, make a real difference in people’s lives.

Public service came at a great cost. During those years, I endured virtual separation from my family. Much of my time was spent at work including weekends and holidays.

The family hardly felt my presence. My wife was alone to rear our children. Thank God, my mother, a widow, helped us selflessly. It was a tough time.

Government’s compensation was modest and not enough to meet my family’s needs. I left it poorer than before I began. My peers were far better off upon my return to private life.

Giving back to society in gratitude for all the help received is what I do today - sharing lessons learned; investing in education; and assisting disaster victims, youth at risk and poor communities.

I serve freely; don’t count the hours; and strive to walk my talk by living up to the values I’ve learned.

I’m a Catholic with an ecumenical outlook; a centrist that moves from left to right of center depending on the issue and circumstances; and a democrat with a firm hand.

I deeply value my acceptance by indigenous tribes in the Cordillera and Sierra Madre, and conferment as a datu and sultan in Mindanao.

I belong as well to the military community - PMA Class of 1974, PNP-Special Action Force, and the Special Forces Regiment (Airborne) and First Scout Ranger Regiment of the Philippine Army
.
I hold the rank of Colonel in the Armed Forces and commanded two (2) Army Infantry Reserve Divisions.

Through their veins run the DNA and saga of the Filipino nation, and I’m both proud and humbled to be brought into their circles.

National security, ranging from human and ecological security to civil and national defense, is close to my heart. Today it is at risk.

Duty calls us to run to Inang Laya’s defense, but we also welcome the help of our economic partners and security allies as we patiently build credible deterrence.

If we are to win the future, we must first strive together to place “country above self” to have a peaceful, prosperous and progressive nation with no one left behind.

We mustn’t be deflated by our continuing failure to make things right, when we’ve already shown in the past that we can. Instead, we must demand results.

We should overcome our apathy; the lack of vision, purpose, discipline and foresight; garbage; traffic; street crime, drugs, poverty, systemic corruption; and the lack of critical thinking.

There are solutions for those problems that ache to be implemented. There’s no need to reinvent the wheel.

To lay the groundwork for change and conclude unfinished business, we need to:

    · regain our moral moorings and reinvent the way we think and behave.
    · generate new wealth while spending wisely.
    · adequately secure ourselves from internal and external threats.
    · amend the constitution to grow a balanced economy, reduce poverty and reverse the diaspora.
    · right-size, professionalize and modernize the bureaucracy.
    · defeat crime, injustice and corruption in high and low places.
    · fortify peacemaking with good governance, firm law enforcement and human development.
    · restore national pride.

That said, will I seek elective office in 2016?

So far, my heart says YES; and dream of being carried to victory on the shoulders of those sectors who I’ve journeyed with.

But my head says NO because the current political culture militates against people like me. I am not “popular”, rich and “flexible.”

Building a national base for new politics takes time in terms of advocacy and organization-building based on integrity, service and merit.

The majority of voters –mainly the youth, D and E segments – who, most of all, need a better and secure life, don’t know who I am.

And, so far, there is no antidote to electoral cheating by PCOS and corrupt gatekeepers that has serially thwarted the people’s choices.

These formidable obstacles must be surmounted to clear the way for honest elections.

Thus, if and when circumstances allow, I will be ready to serve the nation again in a capacity that matches my experience.

I am Rafael “Raffy” Alunan III. I am a Filipino.

Mabuhay and God bless!

P.S. I was lucky to receive a La Sallian education and have Jesuits as spiritual guides. Superb combination!

~~~~O~~~~ 

To know more about what Raffy Alunan is thinking, please go to YouTube; then type "Raffy Alunan Thinking Out Loud." Click on playlists. Click on link to videos: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAg4DftxGsRR-_L9Am-08cw/videos. Select full documentary and the appropriate segment. ~~ Blog Admin.

For instance, know more about Raffy Alunan's thoughts about the tragic end of the SAF 44 on You Tube.

Saturday, December 5, 2015

ISIS terror threat is no excuse to partition Mindanao through Bangsamoro Basic Law (BBL)



"Senator Letty Shahani, who has become a staunch proponent of BBL,   acknowledged that there is a radicalization of ISIS in the world and the Philippines is a good candidate for that radicalization. She also said that the Philippines "as a nation should think of unity and un-division." Actually, I don't see the logic of her statements. Does she mean "preemptive surrender" to deter radicalization of the people of the Philippines and so Ph should sign away parts of Mindanao through BBL?"               

By Marlene Damolo Howe
For the Philippine Sabah Claim Forum
December 4, 2015

“How do you defeat terrorism? Don’t be terrorized. ~~ Salman Rushdie

"The highest patriotism is not a blind acceptance of official policy, but a love of one's country deep enough to call her to a higher plain." ~~ George McGovern

NATIONAL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (PANATANG MAKABAYAN - original version)

I love the Philippines.
It is the land of my birth;
It is the home of my people.
It protects me and helps me to be strong, happy and useful.
In return, I will heed the counsel of my parents;
I will obey the rules of my school;
I will perform the duties of a patriotic, law-abiding citizen;
I will serve my country unselfishly and faithfully
I will be a true Filipino in thought, in word, in deed.


 I just recited this pledge out loud and tears were running down my cheeks. I used to recite this growing up. The words touched the inner core of my heart. Do we have anymore PATRIOTS in the government who will do what's right for Inang Bayan? 

"Sa manululupig di ka pasisiil." Ang mamatay ng dahil sa iyo." These are the two lines of our national anthem (Lupang Hinirang) that Filipinos have sung countless of times since grade school. But many of us have forgotten the meaning of these lines and have become self-serving. We have lost our purpose and have forgotten our duties as good citizens. Many of us have become apathetic and complacent and many have lost their moral compass. Power and money are the main essence of politics in the Philippines. Politicians spend lots of money to buy votes. 

People sell their vote or voting for their celebrity idols that are unqualified and clueless what the job entails. Many would sell the country if they have to for their own benefit. It's time for change for the better! CHANGE STARTS FROM WITHIN IN EACH AND EVERY FILIPINO. STOP THE APATHY AND COMPLACENCY. VOTE FOR QUALIFIED CANDIDATES WITH GOOD MORAL CHARACTER EVEN IF THEIR NAMES ARE NOT WELL-KNOWN TO YOU. STOP VOTING FOR THE SAME INUTILE TRAPOS WHO ARE ALREADY KNOWN CORRUPT. DO IT FOR THE COUNTRY AND FOR THE PEOPLE.

I am personally heartbroken over the news Global terrorism highlights need to pass Bangsamoro bill. The Philippines is prone to threats like ISIS, says former senator Leticia Ramos ~~ Shahani and so disappointed in former Senators Aquilino "Nene" Pimentel and Leticia "Letty" Ramos-Shahani. In fact, if you notice in our welcome statement in the Philippine Sabah Claim Forum (PSCF), you will see that we go by Senator Nene Pimentel's tenet. They were the epitome of good and honest lawmakers who would only do what's best for the country and people; by the people, for the people and of the people. So what gives

Well, according to the article: Global terrorism highlights need to pass Bangsamoro bill. The Philippines is prone to threats like ISIS, says former senator Leticia Ramos ~~ Shahani -- it's about their FEAR OF TERRORISM. So they are now FOR the passage of BBL the way it is. The report said that The Shahani-Pimentel group "called for the passage of the BBL, which both the House and the Senate promised to pass by December 16", and this, despite a potential lack of quorum! Now, that is simply unbelievable! That would be reaking the rules in Congress.

Senator Letty Shahani, who has now become a strong proponent of BBL, acknowledged that there is a radicalization of ISIS in the world and that the Philippines is a good candidate for that radicalization. She also said that the Philippines "as a nation should think of unity and un-division." Actually, I don't see where the logic of her statements. Does she mean "preemptive surrender" to deter radicalization of the people of the Philippines and so PH should sign away parts of Mindanao through BBL?

Whatever happened to "Sa manlulupig, di ka pasisiil/Ang mamatay ng dahil sa iyo?" Should we just roll over and play dead before ISIS turn our people into "Jihadists?" If she talked about "unity and un-division," she should call for ALL FILIPINOS TO BE UNITED IN DEFENDING THE COUNTRY AND NOT JUST SURRENDER WITHOUT A FIGHT. 

Senator Shahani also said that the passage of BBL "will show the political will of the Filipinos who are Christians by religion, that we are one with our Muslim brothers and sisters." We are ALL Filipinos regardless of religion! And if they really want to pass an autonomous Mindanao, go back to the negotiating table and renegotiate the deal TO INCLUDE ALL LUMADS AND MUSLIM FACTIONS. That is UNITY and fair consideration.

Let me be clear in my position on this subject, first and foremost. I am for PEACE but I am also for my beloved Philippines and Sabah! It does not take rocket science to see that BBL gives Inang Bayan the shorter end of the bargain that dismembers the country. Should MILF succeed in obtaining their sub-state, Bangsamoro under their control would become a 'buffer zone' for Malaysia against the Philippines. ..... 

Malaysia will ultimately have de facto control of MILF's Bangsamoro state that includes Palawan -- and will rape its natural resources like it did to Sabah. This has been Malaysia's plan in the making for the past fifty years as it tries its best to outwit and outplay our leaders through bribery and by sowing chaos in our own land -- making us fight among each other. After MILF's BBL, which faction will go next to demand their own BBL? Maybe the MNLF? The BIFF? The Abbu Sayyaf? The Lumads? There's not enough land in Mindanao to be had so they will expand their claim to the Visayas and then Luzon and then the Philippines as a country will cease to exist.

In early 2013 after President Aquino signed a peace agreement with Malaysia-sponsored MILF: the Sultanate of Sulu marched into Sabah (in February 2013) to assert their right to the land before the GPH-MILF Framework Agreement was to take effect. The Sabah stand-off ensued. There is no doubt that the claim to Sabah by the Philippines and the Sultanate of Sulu will be lost forever if Aquino's BBL (Bangsamoro Basic Law) project is ratified by the Philippine legislature. 

This is what has inspired Malaysia, its ulterior motive in being nice to the Philippine politicians, both in elected and appointed capacities. So is this what you call PEACE? How can you call BBL "peace" when it did not even include other factions in the peace talks' equation? It's only peace for MILF and its supporters. Do we really expect other factions like the MNLF to submit to MILF-controlled Bangsamoro state which had actually sprung from the MNLF, the original rebel group?

This is exactly my point! THERE WILL BE NO PEACE IN MINDANAO IF ONLY ONE FACTION IS CONSIDERED IN THE PEACE PROCESS BROKERED BY THE SAME COUNTRY THAT STOLE SABAH FROM US!  To think otherwise, is naive and selfish because this is NOT what's good for our country and people.
 


We already have ARMM (Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao) for our Muslim kababayans in the region which was created under the constitutional protectorate of the Republic. So why BBL? To do so is a sell out to Malaysia because, eventually, they will secede. MILF's not to secede doesn't hold water. Look at what Malaysia is doing to Sabah. Malaysia will not return Sabah because the state is Malaysia's cash cow that funds the Petronas, the Malaysia Federation Corporation that sucks all of Sabah's oil for Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia will do the same to President Aquino's Bangsamoro state should MILF gets its way.


Another point to consider is also MILF's desire to impose Sharia Law. This is DEFINITELY NOT GOOD and NOT FAIR to our Muslim sisters who will be treated as properties instead of equals. Most of us have seen on the news how ISIS stoned a woman to death because of adultery. They threw two gay men off a building because they were gay. They executed 13 teenagers by firing squad using machine guns for watching soccer on TV because it's supposed to be a violation of the Sharia Law. In this case, I assume that TV will then be banned from every household in the future Bangsamoro under Sharia Law.
 
Personally, the only thing I like about the Sharia Law is the cutting off of the hand of a thief as punishment for a first offense and the other for a second offense. I do think we should impose this law upon our corrupt lawmakers. But those in power certainly do not have any problem watching TV themselves and using social media to advance their agenda. How is it fair to our Muslim women and to those who don't fit in a region that is ruled by Sharia Law?



Note: The posters herein are not mine except for the photo of myself. They were lifted from PSCF where they were posted by members.


~~~~O~~~~

Marlene Howe is co-Founder and Administrator of the Philippine Sabah Claim Forum and of the Defenders of Philippine Sabah and Spratly Claims community as well as an administrator of this blog. Ms. Howe is US based but keeps a home in the Philippines.



~~~~O~~~~
REPORT: Global terrorism highlights need to pass Bangsamoro bill. The Philippines is prone to threats like ISIS, says former senator Leticia Ramos ~~ Shahani  

MANILA, Philippines – The recent terrorist attacks in Paris and other parts of the world highlight the importance of passing the proposed Bangsamoro Basic Law (BBL) soonest, a former senator said.
Former senator Leticia Ramos-Shahani made the statement in a news briefing after a meeting of BBL advocates with Speaker Feliciano Belmonte and other lawmakers on Tuesday, December 1. Her group urged the House of Representatives to pass the proposed measure.
"There is indeed a radicalization of ISIS in the world. [And] the Philippines is a very good candidate for that radicalization," Shahani said in the news briefing. 
Also noting the migrant crisis in Europe, the former senator said that the Philippines "as a nation should think of unity and undivision." 
"I think the passage of the BBL will show the political will of the Filipinos – who are Christians by religion – that we are one with our Muslim brothers and sisters in making one nation," she said. 
Shahani and her fellow BBL advocates, former senator Aquilino Pimentel Jr and 1986 Constitutional Commission chairman Christian Monsod, met with Belmonte on Tuesday. Known BBL critic BUHAY party-list Representative Lito Atienza was also at the meeting.
The group called for the passage of the BBL, which both the House and the Senate promised to pass by December 16. 
Rule on quorum The advocates cited one obstacle to deliberations on the BBL – the strict rule on quorum. The lack of quorum has been cited as a major hurdle in discussion of the bill in the plenary. 
But Atienza remained firm on the House rule, saying that they are not changing their position. "If there is no quorum, we cannot tackle BBL," he said in Filipino. 
Pimentel said his group does "not expect the House to just disregard the rules" but argued that there are "higher objectives" to exempt the BBL discussions from the rule on quorum. 
"Why cannot it be accepted as an exception to the general requirement because of the higher objectives in the search for peace in Mindanao? Because otherwise, more lives will be lost," the former senator said. With less than 10 sessions left before Christmas break, there are concerns that Congress would not meet its deadline. 
But Pimentel wanted to remain positive, as further delay in the passage of the measure would mean a major setback for peace efforts in Mindanao. 
"What we would like to see actually is that the BBL will get through the process of Congress at this particular session, before the Christmas break. Anything beyond that will push the peace efforts backwards and we'll be back to square one all over again." 
Despite the dimming possibility of the bill's passage, Belmonte told Rappler in a text message that they still assured the supporters they "are trying their best to pass it." – Rappler.com

Sunday, August 23, 2015

SABAH CLAIM REFRAIN: "BLAME SOMEONE ELSE BUT NOT ME"

"When Malaya's Tunku Abdul Rahman went to Sabah before the Sabah referendum in 1962 to talk to the elders of North Borneo (Sabah), why did not the Philippines and its Government do the same to organise a campaign in situ to get the Sabahans on side? Why didn't they do it?


 
By Anne de Bretagne
For the Philippine Sabah Claim Forum
for the Defenders of the Philippine Sabah & Spratly Claims
and for Sabah Claim Society
23 August 2015


Now, is "blame someone else but me" a distinct Filipino character trait? I'm beginning to think it is! 

For the last few years, the usual refrain when people discuss the Sabah claim issue is to blame the British for the situation the Philippines finds itself in with regard to its stale claim on Sabah. Well, well...

Alright, let's deal with it and throw the Framework Agreement, the BBL, the entire immobile Sabah claim, the Sultanate of Sulu bickering (nearly fratricidal crap, etc, etc) and include with them the kitchen sink at the British. 

I agree the British 'created the problem' as many people, who have just recently discovered the North Borneo (Sabah) conundrum,
have been spewing all over the place.  But here's what: these Filipinos must understand and admit once and for all that the Philippines contributed largely to that decision that created the problem (and continues to contribute unequivocally to the problem TODAY).

But let's be fair and be a bit more clever about things. It's nice to have a punching bag or to have a butt of "sisi" (much like Noynoy aka as Boy Sisi), in this case, the British, but we must ascertain that the Philippines, its leaders and its people aren't at  fault either before we cast blame or "sisi" all around. Anyway, if we want to cast "sisi" all around, here are some real reasons for you to go and do all the "sisi" you want:

(1) At the time, i.e., early 60s, Senator Jovi Salonga was working so hard negotiating with the Brits, your/our own countryman, Senator Lorenzo Sumulong, a flamboyant ex-diplomat to the UN (who happens to be the grand uncle of current PH president, Noynoy Aquino), was going all over the place, attacking and casting vitriolic heaps of acid via the PH Senate pulpit to whip PH Govt and its Sabah claim to extinction. 

He sold the PH claim to Tunku Adul Rahman, then Malaysia's Prime Minister by acting as the soon-to-be-created Malaysia Federation's attack dog against the Government of the Philippines and its claim to Sabah. It wouldn't surprise me therefore, that like the big powers at the time, the Brits took this all-Philippine treasonous approach to the Sabah claim, happening in one of the highest echelons of power, as an excuse to say, "Bloody hell! You people don't know what you want? Well, I'll decide for you!" (Let's not beat around the bush, it was an all-Filipino treason game which must have greatly amused the Brits and the Malayans!) 

(2) Furthermore, if blame has to be cast all around, let's not look far away.... Our own masters and commanders at the time, the great United States of America, did not lift a finger, did not do anything at all to help us convince the British to allow the Sultanate of Sulu to have it back in 1962. On the contrary, the Americans not only did not pay even scant attention to this issue but also discouraged us from tackling the Sabah issue (check out records from as far back as 1957). And one would have thought that as our greatest allies, they would see our way. But heck, no...just didn't happen, but you don't see me around blaming the Americans, now, do you? (Fast forward... In 1967 or 68, it was America that alerted Britain that Marcos was on a "war path" and so what happened? Britain tried to show force by landing fighter aircraft on our own soil. Did America say anything? Nope! Not a word! They were in cahoots with the UK!)

(3) One important element: When Malaya's Tunku Abdul Rahman went to Sabah before the Sabah referendum in 1962 to talk to the elders of North Borneo (Sabah), why did not the Philippines do the same to organise a campaign in situ to get the Sabahans on side? Why?

The Philippine Government was well aware of what was going to happen but did not lift a finger, did not do anything and instead, LEFT EVERYTHING TO FATE as in "Bahala na!" The Government at the time just sat on its big fat ass while the other party, the Malayans led by Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman, were going at things hammer and tong right in the heart of Sabah to convince the Sabahans to join the soon-to-be created Malaysia Federation. TOTAL PHILIPPINE INERTIA! PH Govt just didn't go the extra mile even if it meant saving Sabah claim's own skin for God and country. Parbleu! And you think we are not to blame?

And I can recite a long series of other "blames" but I won't. I'll stop at those because they should be enough to enlighten you.

So, lets be a bit more clever about this, shall we? Because we can't just be making "sisi" all around like Noynoy does today when things go wrong and believe that it's everybody else's fault but ours! If you really want to know, we were as much to blame for being generally do-lally about the claim. 

This "sisi" doctrine seems to be deeply embedded in our psyche but let's get over it and move on!

Let's not allow classic INERTIA (Bahala na!) to overcome us just because it makes us feel better to  whine consistently and to look back to the past to blame the British for all that has gone badly with Sabah (of which, I must remind Filipinos, are also largely, hugely responsible for, anyway) and let this politics of blame stop at the water's edge! Instead, FIND SOLUTIONS TO HOW TO GET THE BLASTED SABAH BACK or at the very least, find solutions not to allow this country to be partitioned by radicals, zealots, fanatics, secessionists, Malaysian warriors by proxy in the southern Philippines with the treasonous complicity -- again of Govt officials, elected and appointed!

Blaming the Brits for the Sabah debacle ad vitam eternam is not going to help achieve what many Filipinos want, i.e., get Sabah back. 

~~~~O~~~~



Friday, August 21, 2015

So, Mr British Ambassador, take my counsel: Keep calm and shut up!

British Ambassador Ahmad

EDITORIAL

"Ambassador Ahmad, you've stepped out of line -- you have gone one step too far when you did that. You showed your true colours if I may say and it is unacceptable that the Foreign Office should keep you on in your Manila post because you have misrepresented Her Majesty's Government by being thoroughly obnoxious to your Philippine hosts. And I must warn you that I wouldn't be remotely surprised if the Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs summons you for a bit of a lecture on proper ambassadorial behaviour and wouldn't astonish me in the least if the PH public demands that Britain recall you!"

By Anne de Bretagne
For the Philippine Sabah Claim Forum
for the Defenders of the Philippine Sabah & Spratly Claims
and for the Sabah Claim Society
21 August 2015


I am flabbergasted that not one of the esteemed members and opinion columnists of the Philippine press has reacted to the news report: "UK envoy: Lack of quorum on BBL unacceptable;  British ambassador Asif Ahmad was reacting to news reports that the lack of quorum was impeding the passage of the BBL at the 291-member House of Representatives."

But we on the PSCF say that it is completely, utterly unacceptable behaviour on the part of the British ambassador to the Philippines to comment negatively on the internal affairs, workings, governance of a foreign country like the Philippines!

Asif Ahmad, British envoy to the Philippines, a solid Muslim, born of a Pakistani father who became a Bangla Desh diplomat took a swipe at the Philippine legislature's lack of quorum and so was unable to tackle the BBL question. Note that Britain is one of the countries that have volunteered to be a member of the "advisory" panel that oversaw Malaysia's engineering of the Framework Agreement.

I would not like to presume that Ambassador Ahmad took a swipe at the lack of quorum in the House of Representatives that was supposed to debate on the proposed Bangsamoro Basic Law because he had a personal interest in the Malaysia-MILF engineered BBL. No,  I wouldn't like to assume that at all! Let me just say outright that while the British ambassador's remarks were technically right, it is thoroughly unacceptable for a British envoy to interfere in the internal affairs and workings of a foreign country where he represents Her Majesty's Government. And I thought British ambassadors and senior members of the British Foreign Office were a bit more intelligent! I do believe that it is now unacceptable that the British Foreign Office should count among them, an envoy of questionable meddling character!

British Ambassador Ahmad has no effing right to tell us to our face, no matter how noble his intentions might be that it was unacceptable "that many members of Congress are not showing up" and to continue with a lecture on how they do it in the UK House of Commons...Simply unacceptable of the British Ambassador to do that. What and who gave him the right to say such things? Certainly not Her Majesty nor Her Majesty's Foreign Office  and definitely not Prime Minister Cameron. So why did he effing open his mouth to criticise a foreign country's internal governance?

To His Excellency, Asif Ahmad, British Ambassador to Manila, answer this question: How would the British Foreign Office, let alone the British public react if the Philippine Ambassador to the Court of St James (London) stood up at a social function and told journalists that "It is unacceptable that the House of Commons acts like a circus during Prime Minister question time"? and if the Ph ambassador added, "Members of the British Parliament must act mature and not act like spoiled brats."?

Ambassador Ahmad, you've stepped out of line -- you have gone one step too far when you did that. You showed your true colours if I may say and it is unacceptable that the Foreign Office should keep you on in your Manila post because you have misrepresented Her Majesty's Government by being thoroughly obnoxious to your Philippine hosts. And I must warn you that I wouldn't be remotely surprised if the Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs summons you for a bit of a lecture on proper ambassadorial behaviour and wouldn't astonish me in the least if the PH public demands that Britain recall you!


So, Mr British Ambassador, take my counsel: Keep calm and shut up!

~~~~O~~~~


REPORT:
UK envoy: lack of quorum unacceptable
British ambassador Asif Ahmad was reacting to news reports that the lack of quorum was impeding the passage of the BBL at the 291-member House of Representatives.

“In the United Kingdom, either you agree or oppose something. It is your duty as an elected official to debate and vote. But to hide under a stone is not doing the job that you are elected to do,” Ahmad told reporters during a reception he hosted at his residence on Tuesday night.

The House of Representatives is in the process of interpolating the draft BBL, which was based on the peace agreement signed by the Aguino administration and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front. It proposes establishing a new, autonomous political entity to replace the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao.

“It is noticeable that many members of Congress are not showing up, which in my view is unacceptable,” Ahmad said.

Britain, which has its own experience dealing with separatist movements, had offered the Philippines its advisory assistance in the Mindanao peace process.

He cited the processes in the UK that led to the Scotland Independence referendum in 2014.–Niña P. Calleja

Read more: http://globalnation.inquirer.net/127515/uk-envoy-lack-of-quorum-on-bbl-unacceptable#ixzz3jTto7SYs

It's time for PH Govt to recognise Operation Merdeka's unsung Filipino heroes who were murdered by Kuala Lumpur


"After nearly 50 years, it's time for the Philippine Republic and its government to be brave, to admit officially to the world that PH did plan to 'invade' Sabah -- and not to give a damn about what Kuala Lumpur might think or say, to open the "official" records and give due recognition to those 'unsung, under cover heroes' of the Republic, who had been embedded in Sabah and who were brutally tortured and murdered by Malaysia's dreaded ISA in the run up to the denunciation of Operation Merdeka, so that they may finally rest in peace! The Republic owes them that..."



By Anne de Bretagne
For the Philippine Sabah Claim Forum
for the Defenders of Philippine Sabah & Spratly Claims
and for the Sabah Claim Society

21 August 2015


The following, in a nutshell, is the "infamous" Operation Merdeka, i.e., Philippine plan to recover Sabah (before the plan was scuttled):

Operation Merdeka was originally the brainchild of President Diosdado Macapagal but its execution was organised by his successor, President Marcos. The plan was not to wage war against the Suluks in Sabah (Suluks are the Tausug inhabitants of Sabah) but only to create disturbance in Sabah. The initial purpose was to INFILTRATE Sabah by sending military trained Tausugs from Sulu to organise huge rallies, enormous rallies (much like what Putin did to Crimea) and to catch the Peninsular Malaysians by surprise... Noting the distance between KL and Kota Kinabalu, Marcos was banking on the element of surprise, i.e., that it would take Kuala Lumpur a great deal of time to scramble their fighters and by then everything would be over. Sabah would be under PH control.

Marcos had a squadron of the the Philippine Air Force which got ready to fly over Kota Kinabalu and other towns (in a bid to frighten whatever KL troops or sentries were there) while the infiltrated troops (Tausugs and their AFP military handlers) were occupying the most sensitive positions, hoist the PH FLAG atop every point, blast the announcement over loudspeakers all over Sabah towns... the PHIL AIR FORCE fighter aircraft then would fly over to signal that Sabah was retaken! THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE OPERATION MERDEKA

But as ever, Murphy's military law played its hand: "Everything that can go wrong, will go wrong!" because Senator Ninoy Aquino, true to the Aquino clan mantra, would rather sabotage the plan against his own countrys interest to favour the Peninsular Malaysians -- God knows we know not why -- just as Senator Sumulong (his 'uncle-in-law) had done before him and just as his son is doing today.

And what the Filipino public hardly knows about is what happened after Operation Merdeka was denounced: Filipinos under cover, on mission for the  Republic were captured, ruthlessly tortured, killed, and are buried in the recesses of Sabah.

Understand that there were already hundreds of PH assets, military and para-military who had gone under cover and had infiltrated Sabah* (long before the so-called or the sensationalised "Jabidah-Corregidor Massacre" victims); they had already been sent to Sabah, had been lying under cover all over Sabah in preparation for the 'Operation' and who were caught in the quagmire in Sabah (North Borneo) after Sen Ninoy Aquino denounced the operation on the Senate pulpit.


Kuala Lumpur's intel agencies, led by Malaysia's dreaded ISA, moved with lightning speed, captured many of them, tortured and killed many, many of them -- impossible to determine today the number of Filipino para-military and military infiltrates in Sabah who were ruthlessly tortured and summarily executed unless we open PH Government records officially. A horrendous end for these Filipinos who were on mission for the Republic but who remain officially nameless today. They were Filipinos.

*NB: These Operation Merdeka assets had already infiltrated Sabah as moles, plants, sleepers, undercover agents, etc., long before the sensationalised "Jabidah Massacre" and were not the "Tausug trainees' referred to in the Corregidor-Jabidah Massacre episode exposed by Senator Ninoy Aquino and who were still being groomed precisely to join these assets that had already been embedded in Sabah. The embedded assets in Sabah fell victims to Malaysia's killer hands following the denunciation of the Operation in the Senate by Senator Ninoy Aquino.


Until today, many of -- if not all, those nameless PH casualties cannot be officially recognised by our government, cannot be given proper burial, or even just be given proper honours, because to officially recognise them as Operation Merdeka heroes, PH must admit to having planned and partly executed the invasion of Sabah and that just cannot be done according to PH government. So, today, there are many unsung heroes, casualties of this "silent, undeclared war", buried in Sabah without recognition from their government for what they have done in the name of the Republic. But Malaysia knows the crimes it has committed on these people in 1968 and knows that PH doesn't give a damn about them.

It's time to face what happened in Sabah after the scuttling of Operation Merdeka nearly 50 years ago to honour those Filipinos who were sent on a covert mission but never came back because they were captured, tortured and killed by Malaysia if only to give them proper burial.

  
After almost 50 years, it's time for the Philippine Republic and its government to be brave, to admit officially to the world that PH did plan to 'invade' Sabah -- and not to give a damn about what Kuala Lumpur might think or say, to open the "official" records and give due recognition to those 'unsung, under cover heroes' of the Republic who were brutally tortured and murdered by Malaysia's dreaded ISA in the run up to the denunciation of Operation Merdeka so that they may finally rest in peace! The Republic owes them that...

Thursday, May 21, 2015

YES TO PEACE, NO TO BBL MANIFESTO


Former DILG chief with some members of FORMA




On Sunday, 24th May, beginning at 8 AM, Rafael Alunan III, former Interior and Local Govenment secretary will be leading a prayer rally at the Luneta Park in Manila under the banner of 'Yes to Peace, No to BBL.'  As the country faces grave threats to its sovereignty, Rafael Alunan III, one of the major state actors who helped paved the way for the PH government and the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) to reach a peace deal in 1996, has emerged as the strongest champion of national cohesion and is widely recognised today as the most fearless advocate for maintaining the country's territorial integrity. ~~ Blog Administrator



MANIFESTO 
By Rafael M. Alunan III
22 May 2015

 

MAY 24 YES TO PEACE, NO TO THE BBL PRAYER RALLY 8 A.M. SUNDAY AT THE LUNETA PARK
YES TO PEACE. NO TO THE BANGSAMORO BASIC LAW!  
Retain and Strengthen the ARMM and Local Autonomy.

Today, we find our nation in peril and our democratic way of life under threat, both externally and from within. All too often, the common good and national interests are sacrificed on the altar of political expediency, corruption and self-serving hidden agendas.

Nowhere is this disconnect from reality more pronounced than on the issue of the “peace process” undertaken exclusively with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) that produced the Comprehensive Agreement on BangsaMoro (CAB), and the BangsaMoro Basic Law (BBL), a proposed bill that seeks to replace R.A. 6734 that created the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao.

We believe that a significant majority in Mindanao, and around the country, opposes the CAB-BBL because the process was not transparent, inclusive and thoroughly consultative, not unlike the MOA-AD that the CAB mirrors, which the Supreme Court struck down during the term of former president Gloria Arroyo.

Yet, government has chosen to ignore the people’s dire warnings so far to change course in order to achieve real peace. It continues to press for its passage not later than June 2015. The Aquino administration is subsequently violating the Tripoli Agreement and dismissing the 1996 peace agreement between the government and the MNLF.

We are a group of Filipino citizens from Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao that oppose the BBL for the following reasons:

1. MALAYSIA: The choice of Malaysia as third party mediator was ludicrous because it is conflicted. Malaysia opposes our Sabah claim and has persistently undermined our nation's stability as a state that funded, organized and trained secessionist groups – originally the MNLF and, subsequently, the MILF.

2. BASIC LAW: The nomenclature BangsaMoro Basic Law (BBL) is in itself, a thinly veiled attempt at usurping the constitution. "Basic Law" connotes a constitution of a state, in this case, the BangsaMoro, to which all laws must conform.

3. BANGSAMORO TERRITORY: Sec 2 to 5, Art III of the BBL defines the BangsaMoro Territory and suggests a separate territorial enclave within sovereign Philippine territory. It aims to give a homeland to a group that does not represent the hopes and aspirations of excluded sectors and infested with Islamist radicals connected to the global jihadist movement under a caliphate.

4. SELF-GOVERNANCE AND RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION: Sec 1 Art IV speaks of self-governance. Later on, the “RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION" was inserted showing manifest bad faith on the part of the MILF. The intent cannot be mistaken for anything but a prelude to a subsequent declaration of independence or secession.

5. A PARLIAMENTARY FORM OF GOVERNMENT: Sec 2 Art IV of the BBL prescribes a parliamentary form of government that contravenes Section 1 Art 2 and Sec 1 Article VI of the 1987 Constitution, which mandate a Republican and Presidential form of government.

6. BANGSAMORO POLICE AND BANGSAMORO COMMAND: Sec 2 Art XI creates a BangsaMoro Police, while Sec 15 Art XI establishes a BangsaMoro Command both of which will nominally be part of the PNP and AFP. Their creation constitutes a duplication of sovereign prerogatives, violating Section 3 Article II and Section 6 Article XVI of the 1987 Constitution, which recognize the AFP as the sole bearer of military arms and the PNP as the sole security apparatus of the state, respectively.

7. BANGSAMORO GOVERNMENT AGENCIES:
The provisions creating a Civil Service (Sec 2 par. 1.8 Art. V); a Police Board equivalent to the NAPOLCOM (Sec 5 Art XI); a Commission on Human Rights (Sec 7 Art IX); a Public Attorney’s Office and Prosecution Service (Sec 18-19 Art X); a Commission on Audit (Sec 2 Art XII); a Tax Office (Sec.11 Art XII), and a Sharia Judicial and Bar Council (Sec 10 Art 10X), can only be viewed as a clear usurpation and duplication of sovereign functions and powers.

8. WALI: Sec 1 Art VIII of the BBL, creating the position of WALI or titular head of the BangsaMoro that mirrors the role of a head of state.

9. RELATIONS WITH THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT: Sec 1-2 Art VI imposes an “Asymmetric Relationship” and “Parity of Esteem” to govern relations between the proposed entity and the Central government giving the former equal status and parity with the latter. With all the elements of a state virtually granted and guaranteed by the proposed basic law (people, sovereignty, territory and government) the BBL will create a parallel state and can lead to no other conclusion other than an eventual bid by the MILF at independence.

10. PEACE PROCESS: We have reason to believe that the process that was undertaken that led to the signing of the CAB was furtive, not unlike the process that the Arroyo Administration chose to take in trying to obtain public approval for the unlamented MOA-AD. Contrary to this administration’s claims, the peace panel chose to be exclusionary and failed to undertake extensive, open and transparent consultations of all stakeholders within the area of interest. The MOA-AD was brought before the Supreme Court where it was struck down for all the reasons mentioned. The same should be done to the CAB-BBL.

11. INTERNAL SECURITY AND PUBLIC SAFETY: The recent massacre of forty-four (44) PNP Special Action Force law enforcers by the MILF-BIFF and other sympathetic armed groups, has thrown the MILF-BIFF’s sincerity and trustworthiness further into question. The MILF-BIFF is connected to the global jihadist movement, mainly Al Qaeda and Jema’ah Islamiya. Its alleged breakaway group, the BangsaMoro Islamic Freedom Fighters (BIFF), has reportedly pledged allegiance to ISIS. The MILF and BIFF were co-located in Mamasapano, Maguindanao that provided safe harbor to international terrorists with bounties on their heads – Marwan and Usman. Granting the MILF a homeland is akin to putting a revolver to our heads and playing Russian roulette. Retired Supreme Court Justice Florentino Feliciano said he does not believe the BBL alone can bring peace to Mindanao. The peace problem in Mindanao he said “cannot be whisked away by uttering the word 'peace' no matter how often or loudly the utterance might be.”

12. CULTURE: BBL proponents say that ARMM was a “failed experiment” citing the regional government’s failure to reverse its feudalistic practices, poverty, economic backwardness, rebellion, terror and revenge killings. Changing the political system is the recommended solution to its cultural problem. ARMM’s creation was not an experiment. Its failure lies not in the political system but in the attitudes, behavior and skills of the people. Breaking the vicious cycle requires persistent and sufficient investments in capacity and capability building especially in the tenets of good governance. This is the real solution to the failure of governance in ARMM. If the driver keeps crashing the car, the solution is to retrain the driver instead of changing the car.

13. Social Justice: Proponents say that the BBL addresses the centuries of social injustice suffered by the Muslims in Mindanao. Social injustice, we maintain, is a national concern that has bred armed rebellions and social discontent around the country. Feudalistic practices and the revenge culture are causes of social injustice. So is exclusion that the incumbent administration is accused of. In summary, the BBL betrays the public trust, violates the Constitution; undermines Philippine sovereignty and places public safety and internal security at grave risk. While the incumbent administration maintains that peace in Mindanao will be outgrowth of the BBL, we believe otherwise.

The BBL will be the nation’s undoing. It will inflict more violence and bloodshed; and usher in the country’s eventual disintegration. Every Filipino seeks an enduring peace, but not one obtained furtively and ignores the red flags that could further fragment society, dismember the country and cause more bloodshed. The Comprehensive Agreeement on BangsaMoro and the Bangsamoro Basic Law (CAB-BBL), as signed and originally submitted to Congress, respectively, should be stoutly opposed and rejected. We implore you, our people’s representatives, to do what is right for the sake of our people and the nation’s future.

~~~~O~~~~~

Gising mga Muslim! Ang may pag-iisip ay nag-iisip!

"Dahil ang hangad ng Malaysia ay ang yamang langis at yamang likas mula sa mayamang lupa at dagat ng Mindanao. Magsisilbi itong anihan ng yaman para sa mamamayan ng Malaysia sa kanilang pangangailangang mina mula sa lupa, pagkaing halaw sa bukid at isdang galing sa dagat ng Mindanao."




By E. S. Cruz 
For FORMA - Friends of Rafael Alunan III
20 May 2015




Alam lamang ng Muslim Mindanao ang laban sa kuffar (Christians/Manila). Ang tunay nilang kaaway ay Malaysia kahit isa itong bansang Muslim.

Dahil ang hangad ng Malaysia ay ang yamang langis at yamang likas mula sa mayamang lupa at dagat ng Mindanao. Magsisilbi itong anihan ng yaman para sa mamamayan ng Malaysia sa kanilang pangangailangang mina mula sa lupa, pagkaing halaw sa bukid at isdang galing sa dagat ng Mindanao. Ipinain ng Malaysia ang Muslim Mindanao sa laban sa gobyerno upang manghinawa ang Muslim Mindanao sa kakayahang mamuno at magbigay ng sagot ng gobyernong Pilipinas sa pangangailangan ng Mindanao. 

Ngayon ay ipinalalabas na 'Peace' o Katahimikan sa pag ayon ng gobyerno ng Pilipinas sa lihim na hangarin ng Malaysia; ang tuluyang paghiwalay ng Mindanao sa Pilipinas at pagsanib sa Malaysia.
 
Gising mga Muslim! Ang may pag-iisip ay nag-iisip. May mga bagay ng hindi ninyo gusto subalit makabubuti sa inyo at may mga bagay na inyong gusto subalit makasasama sa inyo. Surah 2. Al-Baqara, Ayah 216

Ùƒُتِبَ عَÙ„َÙŠْÙƒُÙ…ُ الْÙ‚ِتَالُ ÙˆَÙ‡ُÙˆَ ÙƒُرْÙ‡ٌ Ù„َÙƒُÙ…ْ ۖ ÙˆَعَسَÙ‰ٰ Ø£َÙ†ْ تَÙƒْرَÙ‡ُوا Ø´َÙŠْئًا ÙˆَÙ‡ُÙˆَ Ø®َÙŠْرٌ Ù„َÙƒُÙ…ْ ۖ ÙˆَعَسَÙ‰ٰ Ø£َÙ†ْ تُØ­ِبُّوا Ø´َÙŠْئًا ÙˆَÙ‡ُÙˆَ Ø´َرٌّ Ù„َÙƒُÙ…ْ ۗ ÙˆَاللَّÙ‡ُ ÙŠَعْÙ„َÙ…ُ ÙˆَØ£َÙ†ْتُÙ…ْ Ù„َا تَعْÙ„َÙ…ُونَ
Fighting is prescribed for you and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth and ye know not. Quf al BBL wa Sabru!

Itigil ang BBL at maghintay. Stop BBL and Wait!
Ang Malaysia ay magnanakaw!/ Malaysia al harami'l kubra!Ninanakaw ng Malaysia and lupa at langis ng Sabah!Isusunod ng Malaysia ang pagnanakaw sa Mindanao!

~~~~O~~~~


The author, an administrator of FORMA - Friends of Rafael Alunan III, is Muslim and is a staunch advocate of "YES TO PEACE! NO TO BBL" Movement.

Sunday, February 15, 2015

GENERAL CATAPANG IS A MORAL COWARD BECAUSE HE DID NOT DARE GIVE THE ORDER


"There's one thing that a senior military commander cannot be and that is to be a moral coward. That is why senior military people are held in so much esteem throughout the world because senior military commanders are expected to make difficult decisions and give orders in the face of extreme stress or pressures and with huge moral implication because they pertain to life and death."


By Anne de Bretagne
for the Philippine Sabah Claim Forum
and for the Defenders of Philippine Sabah & Spratly Claims
13 February 2015

General Catapang, chief-of-staff, Armed Forces of the Philippines said that 'he did not inform President Aquino about the clash Mamasapano clash although they were aware of it and they were with him all day on January 25' nor of a request for reinforcement at the height of the deadly encounter with the rebel Moro Islamic Liberation Front and the Bangsamoro Islamic Liberation Front forces that cost the lives of 44 officers and men of the PNP-Special Action Force. Actually the minute Catapang did not inform the president, he should have realised that he was already MAKING a command decision and that decision entailed COMMAND RESPONSIBILITY. He should be relieved.

Obviously, General Catapang (translated in Pilipino, 'catapang' means 'so brave') acted that way because he had "read" Noynoy's wishy-washy body language and admitted that he knew of the president's position, i.e., MILF first, that the so-called peace agreement 'should not be jeopardised' so he did not make a move nor provide reinforcement. What a disaster!

Catapang should have set aside all that and moved! After all, without a direct order from the president for the AFP NOT TO MOVE, i.e., that AFP was not to provide reinforcement no matter what, Catapang should have made his own command decision to provide reinforcement... He had those four stars to use as commander of the entire military at that specific instance. IT WAS REALLY NOT DIFFICULT TO MAKE A COMMAND DECISION at that specific moment: shots were fired and being fired, help was being asked for, people were obviously dying and would die still!


I still can't believe that General Catapang could even dare declare that the AFP gave no artillery support to SAF to avoid 'war' with the MILF There they were, the PNP-SAFs being shot at and being killed by combined MILF-BIFF rebel forces, were clearly under war-like attack, needing urgent troop reinforcement and at the very least, small artillery support, eg., mortars, but Catapang withheld that support for what? To avoid war with the MILF? Avoid war with the MILF? But the MILF-BIFF were already killing your brothers-in-arms, General!

General Catapang, how do you expect men to obey your command in the future, fight for you and even prepare to die for you if they believe they might not get the support they need when they ask for it during the heat of a battle because of some dubious political consideration?

They were killing your brothers-in-arms, General! How could you not have sent reinforcement and not given them small artillery support?


Catapang, a military officer that he is, should have realised that THE PEACE AGREEMENT WAS BEING BROKEN AT THAT VERY MOMENT and that by staying mum, doing nothing could not spell anything but bad poor, execrable military commander's judgement. He knows and must have known as a four-star general that the minute shots were fired, the CEASEFIRE WAS BROKEN! Hence, there was nothing holding back the Armed Forces of the Philippines from providing reinforcement to their beleaguered colleagues in the face of the enemy.

Therefore, to have refused to provide reinforcement to his beleaguered brothers-in-arms, clearly under attack, was a violation of the moral code of conduct of any serving military officer. This four-star officer should be stripped of his stars and be sacked!

But who will sack him? President Noynoy Aquino? The commander in chief, who believes that he has no command responsibility for what happened? The commander in chief who has no clue that the minute he ordered the other troops to stand down, he was in fact taking DIRECT OPERATIONAL CONTROL and therefore assumed direct and full responsibility for the murder of those SAF44... So, never mind Noynoy. He is useless!

As ever, military officers, even if they happen to have four shiny golden stars on those broad or narrow shoulders (in the case of Catapang), are only as good as their ability -- or inability, to be good and brave officers and commanders when the going gets tough. But there's one thing that a senior military commander cannot be and that is to be a moral coward. That is why senior military people are held in so much esteem throughout the world because senior military commanders are expected to make difficult decisions and give orders in the face of extreme stress and with huge moral implication because they pertain to life and death.

I accuse General Catapang of being a moral coward, an execrable senior military officer and poor commander!


~~~~O~~~~


Mamasapano clash: Who told Aquino when?